← Back to the issue Issue No. 01 · Sources

Check our work

Every figure, and where it came from

The issue makes an argument about records. It would be poor form to publish that without one. Every statistic in Issue No. 01 is listed here with the body that produced it, so you can go to the original rather than take our word for it.

Anilox volume and wear thresholds

Workforce and the retirement cliff

Automation, judgment and the human in the loop

Data, records and cost

One of the four numbers carrying the argument runs against our own case. It is in the issue on purpose, and it is sourced here like all the others.

Corrections

29 September 2026 · folio 23, The Foundation
Two descriptions of the founder's early software work were changed. The system he rebuilt as a teenager was described as an open-world MMO RPG; it is zone-based, so the word was removed. The same pages said he had taken over that system, which implies a handover that did not happen; it now reads that he rebuilt it. The claim being made is unchanged: he rebuilt it, self-taught, before he could drive.
29 September 2026 · folio 09, The Receipts
The source credit on the consultant study read "2023, published 2026" and now reads "2023/2026", with the full citation on this page. Fieldwork year and publication year are both unchanged.
29 September 2026 · folio 13, Coexistence
One word set in British spelling, "favourites", corrected to "favorites". No change of meaning.

The printed first run of Issue No. 01 carries the earlier wording on folios 09 and 23. The digital edition on this site is the corrected one.

If a figure is wrong, tell me and the correction is published on this page with the date it was made. We do not quietly edit anything. Correction beats agreement, and silence beats neither.

Write to info@27creative.studio or call 863-869-2727.